Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

HOLSTROM v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP., 53 Or. App. 189 (1981)

In the Matter of Comp. of Paul E. Holstrom, Claimant.HOLSTROM, Petitioner, v. STATE ACCIDENT Ins. FUND CORPORATION,Respondent., 630 P.2d 1347 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1981-07-20
Topic: general

HOLSTROM v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP., 53 Or. App. 189 (1981) 630 P.2d 1347 In the Matter of the Compensation of Paul E. Holstrom, Claimant.HOLSTROM, Petitioner, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION,Respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HOLSTROM v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP., 53 Or. App. 189 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HOLSTROM v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP.,53 Or. App. 189(1981)

630 P.2d 1347

In the Matter of the Compensation of Paul E. Holstrom, Claimant.

HOLSTROM,Petitioner,v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION,

Respondent.

No. 78-6918, CA 19382

Oregon Court of Appeals.

On petitioner's reconsideration filed June 17, and respondent's

response to reconsideration filed June 18, former opinion filed May 18

(52 Or. App. 233, 628 P.2d 799),

reconsideration allowed, former opinion adhered to July 20, 1981

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Charles Paulson, Portland, for petition.

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation, Salem, contra.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for reconsideration allowed, former opinion adhered to.

PER CURIAM.

We adhere to our previous affirmance of this case, which was based upon ourde novoassessment of the extent of claimant's disability.

Petition for reconsideration allowed, former opinion adhered to.Page 190