Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

HOAG v. DURAFLAKE, 37 Or. App. 103 (1978)

HOAG, Petitioner, v. DURAFLAKE CO., Respondent., 585 P.2d 1149 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1978-12-27
Topic
general

HOAG v. DURAFLAKE, 37 Or. App. 103 (1978) 585 P.2d 1149 HOAG, Petitioner, v. DURAFLAKE CO., Respondent. No. 76-3429, CA 9908Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued July 1, 1978 Affirmed as modified November 6, reconsideration deniedDecember 12, petition for review denied December 27, 1978, 284 Or. 521 Judicial Review the from Workers' Compensation Board.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HOAG v. DURAFLAKE, 37 Or. App. 103 (1978). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HOAG v. DURAFLAKE,37 Or. App. 103(1978)
585 P.2d 1149
HOAG,Petitioner,v. DURAFLAKE CO.,Respondent.
No. 76-3429, CA 9908
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued July 1, 1978
Affirmed as modified November 6, reconsideration denied
December 12, petition for review denied December 27, 1978,284 Or. 521
Judicial Review the from Workers' Compensation Board.
Clayton C. Patrick, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner.

With him on the brief was Harold W. Adams, Salem.

Roger Warren, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Philip A. Mongrain, Beaverton.
Before Johnson, P. J., and Gillette and Roberts, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as modified.Page 104

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 105
PER CURIAM.
The issue in this workers' compensation case is the extent of claimant's disability. The question is purely factual. Although we disagree with the Workers' Compensation Board's determination, exposition of the facts would not in any way aid the Board or the bar in analyzing future cases. Accordingly, as we explained inBowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.,33 Or. App. 241,576 P.2d 27(1978), we will not in this or usually in similar future cases publish an extended opinion. Here we note only that, after an evaluation of the record in our role as a "jury," we believe that this claimant is permanently partially disabled to the extent of 288 degrees or 80 percent.

Affirmed as modified.Page 106

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 107