Opinion · Florida Court Opinions
HINES v. STATE, 346 So.2d 1235 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1977)
DAVID JOSEPH HINES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF Fla., APPELLEE., 346 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Florida Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Date
- 1977-06-15
- Topic
- general
HINES v. STATE, 346 So.2d 1235 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1977) DAVID JOSEPH HINES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. Nos. 76-634, 76-635.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 15, 1977.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed HINES v. STATE, 346 So.2d 1235 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1977). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
HINES v. STATE,346 So.2d 1235(Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1977)
DAVID JOSEPH HINES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.
Nos. 76-634, 76-635.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 15, 1977.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Finding no merit in the points raised by appellant in his appeal from revocation of probation, we affirm the convictions. The sentence imposed in Case No. 75-143 (Appeal No. 76-635) was, however, an impermissible general sentence. We, therefore, remand for resentencing Case No. 75-143 in accordance withDarden v.State,306 So.2d 581(Fla.2d DCA 1975). The sentence imposed must be apportioned among the convictions,Maxwell v. State,336 So.2d 658(Fla.2d DCA 1976).
McNULTY, Acting C.J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.