Opinion · Nylaw New York

HERMAN v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., 200 App. Div. 896 (1922)

HILDA HERMAN, an Infant, by MAX HERMAN, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent,v. GRIFFIN Mfg. CO., INC., Appellant., 200 A.D. 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1922)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1922-01-01
Topic: general

HERMAN v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., 200 App. Div. 896 (1922) HILDA HERMAN, an Infant, by MAX HERMAN, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent,v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. February, 1922.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HERMAN v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., 200 App. Div. 896 (1922). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HERMAN v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.,200 App. Div. 896(1922)

HILDA HERMAN, an Infant, by MAX HERMAN, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent,

v. GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

February, 1922.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.