Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

HERALD v. HOOD, 70 Ohio St.3d 1210 (1994)

639 N.E.2d 109

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1994-09-28
Topic
general

HERALD v. HOOD, 70 Ohio St.3d 1210 (1994) 639 N.E.2d 109 HERALD, APPELLEE, v. HOOD, APPELLANT. No. 93-1864Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted August 31, 1994 — Decided September 28, 1994. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 15986.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HERALD v. HOOD, 70 Ohio St.3d 1210 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HERALD v. HOOD,70 Ohio St.3d 1210(1994)
639 N.E.2d 109
HERALD, APPELLEE, v. HOOD, APPELLANT.
No. 93-1864
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Submitted August 31, 1994 —
Decided September 28, 1994.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 15986.
Robert A. RoyerandSuzanne C. Porter, for appellee.Ted ChuparkoffandWayne Hassay, for appellant.Joan Krauskopf, urging affirmance foramici curiae, Now Legal Defense and Education Fund and Ohio National Organization for Women, Inc.
Based upon our decision inAult v. Jasko(1994),70 Ohio St.3d 114,637 N.E.2d 870, wherein we applied the discovery rule for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations in child-sexual-abuse-repressed-memory cases, this appeal is dismissed,sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion inAult v. Jasko(1994),70 Ohio St.3d 114,637 N.E.2d 870.Page 1211