Opinion · Nylaw New York
HEIMAN v. VARSITY BUS, INC., 31 A.D.2d 757 [2d Dept 1969]
EDWARD HEIMAN, an Infant, by His Father & Nat. Guardian, MILTON HEIMAN,et al., Respondents, v. VARSITY BUS, INC. et al., Appellants, et al.,Defendants. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Other Actions.), 31 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1969)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1969-01-20
- Topic
- general
HEIMAN v. VARSITY BUS, INC., 31 A.D.2d 757 [2d Dept 1969] EDWARD HEIMAN, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, MILTON HEIMAN,et al., Respondents, v. VARSITY BUS, INC. et al., Appellants, et al.,Defendants. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Other Actions.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January 20, 1969 Appeal, as limited by appellant's brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 29, 1968, as granted a trial preference.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed HEIMAN v. VARSITY BUS, INC., 31 A.D.2d 757 [2d Dept 1969]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.