Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

HEIM v. TORRINGTON COMPANY, 136 F.2d 683 (2nd Cir. 1943)

Lewis R. HEIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TORRINGTON COMPANY,Defendant-Appellee., 136 F.2d 683 (2d Cir. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1943-05-17
Topic: general

HEIM v. TORRINGTON COMPANY, 136 F.2d 683 (2nd Cir. 1943) Lewis R. HEIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TORRINGTON COMPANY,Defendant-Appellee. No. 231.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HEIM v. TORRINGTON COMPANY, 136 F.2d 683 (2nd Cir. 1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HEIM v. TORRINGTON COMPANY,136 F.2d 683(2nd Cir. 1943)

Lewis R. HEIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TORRINGTON COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 231.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 17, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.

Lewis R. Heim and Blair, Curtis Hayward, all of New York City (Robert S. Blair, John C. Blair, and James L. Black, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Herbert H. Porter and Eugene G. Mason, both of Washington, D.C. (T. Clay Lindsey, of Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on the opinion below,50 F. Supp. 500.