Opinion · Nylaw New York

HART v. UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION, 283 N.Y. 589 (1940)

WILLIAM S. HART et al., Copartners Doing Bus. under the Name of WILLIAMS. HART Co., Respondents, v. UNITED ARTISTS Corp., Appellant., 283 N.Y. 589 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1940)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1940-05-21
Topic: general

HART v. UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION, 283 N.Y. 589 (1940) WILLIAM S. HART et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of WILLIAMS. HART COMPANY, Respondents, v. UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 15, 1940 Decided May 21, 1940 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, SHIENTAG, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HART v. UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION, 283 N.Y. 589 (1940). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HARTv.UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION,283 N.Y. 589(1940)

WILLIAM S. HART et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of WILLIAM

S. HART COMPANY, Respondents,v.UNITED ARTISTS CORPORATION, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 15, 1940

Decided May 21, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, SHIENTAG, J.Page 590

Joseph M. Proskauer, Arthur F. Driscoll, J. Alvin Van Bergh,Edward C. RafteryandJacob P. Aronsonfor appellant.Max D. Steuer, Jesse HemleyandLeonard Hemleyfor respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.