Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

GRAF v. NEWARK, 129 N.J.L. 96 (1942)

ANNA S.A. GRAF ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT., 28 A.2d 118 (Ct. Err. & App. 1942)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1942-09-18
Topic
general

GRAF v. NEWARK, 129 N.J.L. 96 (1942) 28 A.2d 118 ANNA S.A. GRAF ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued May 21, 1942 — Decided September 18, 1942. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in124 N.J.L. 312.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GRAF v. NEWARK, 129 N.J.L. 96 (1942). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GRAF v. NEWARK,129 N.J.L. 96(1942)
28 A.2d 118
ANNA S.A. GRAF ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Argued May 21, 1942 —
Decided September 18, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in124 N.J.L. 312.
For the appellants,Kussy, Cohn Kohn(William E. Clark, special counsel,Raymond H. Cohn, of counsel).Page 97

For the respondent,Raymond Schroeder.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, HEHER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 7.For reversal— PERSKIE, COLIE, THOMPSON, JJ. 3.