Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

GRACE NATL. BK. OF N.Y. v. C.I.R., 189 F.2d 966 (2nd Cir. 1951)

GRACE Nat’l BANK OF N.Y., Petitioner on Rev., v. Comm’r OFINTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent on Review., 189 F.2d 966 (2d Cir. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-06-25
Topic: general

GRACE NATL. BK. OF N.Y. v. C.I.R., 189 F.2d 966 (2nd Cir. 1951) GRACE NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Petitioner on Review, v. COMMISSIONER OFINTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent on Review.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GRACE NATL. BK. OF N.Y. v. C.I.R., 189 F.2d 966 (2nd Cir. 1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GRACE NATL. BK. OF N.Y. v. C.I.R.,189 F.2d 966(2nd Cir. 1951)

GRACE NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Petitioner on Review, v. COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent on Review.

No. 286, Docket 21967.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 5, 1951.

Decided June 25, 1951.

Gerard L. Carroll, New York City, for petitioner on review.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before CHASE, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed on opinion below.15 T.C. 563.