Opinion · Nylaw New York

GOLDBERG v. DAYNE, 279 App. Div. 745 (1951)

ABRAHAM GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. NAT DAYNE et al., Respondents., 279 A.D. 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1951-12-03
Topic: general

GOLDBERG v. DAYNE, 279 App. Div. 745 (1951) ABRAHAM GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. NAT DAYNE et al., Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. December 3, 1951.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GOLDBERG v. DAYNE, 279 App. Div. 745 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending

GOLDBERG v. DAYNE,279 App. Div. 745(1951)

ABRAHAM GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. NAT DAYNE et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December 3, 1951.

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs.

Present — Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [Seeante, p. 614.]