Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. E. FRED SULZER CO., 48 N.J. 350 (1966)

225 A.2d 362

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1966-11-01
Topic: general

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. E. FRED SULZER CO., 48 N.J. 350 (1966) 225 A.2d 362 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-PETITIONER, v. E. FREDSULZER CO., ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND AMERICAN CYANAMID CO.,DEFENDANT-PETITIONER AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. E. FRED SULZER CO., 48 N.J. 350 (1966). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. E. FRED SULZER CO.,48 N.J. 350(1966)

225 A.2d 362

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-PETITIONER, v. E. FRED

SULZER CO.,ETC., ET AL.,DEFENDANTS AND AMERICAN CYANAMID CO.,

DEFENDANT-PETITIONER AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

November 1, 1966.

On petition and cross-petition for certification to Appellate Division, Superior Court.

See same case below:92 N.J. Super. 210.

Messrs. Levy, McCloskey Schlesingerfor the petitioner, cross-respondent.Messrs. McCarter English, Mr. Julius B. PoppingaandMr.John R. Drosdickfor the respondent-cross-petitioner.

Denied.