Opinion · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Furlong v. Coleman

9 F. Cas. 1010

Type: Opinion
Court: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1827-11-15
Topic: general

THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) said, that the rule being laid at the last term in open court, and not objected to, at that time, the burden of proof was now on the plaintiff to show that he was a resident of the county at that time. That the plaintiff, and his counsel were bound to take notice of all the orders made by the court in the cause.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Furlong v. Coleman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

said, that the rule being laid at the last term in open court, and not objected to, at that time, the burden of proof was now on the plaintiff to show that he was a resident of the county at that time. That the plaintiff, and his counsel were bound to take notice of all the orders made by the court in the cause.