Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

FULTON FOUNDRY MACH. v. C.I.R., 249 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1957)

FULTON FOUNDRY Mach. Co., Petitioner, v. Comm’r OFINTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent., 249 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1957)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1957-10-26
Topic: general

FULTON FOUNDRY MACH. v. C.I.R., 249 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1957) FULTON FOUNDRY MACHINERY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OFINTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 13108.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. October 26, 1957.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FULTON FOUNDRY MACH. v. C.I.R., 249 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1957). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FULTON FOUNDRY MACH. v. C.I.R.,249 F.2d 445(6th Cir. 1957)

FULTON FOUNDRY MACHINERY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13108.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 26, 1957.

Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court.

James C. Herndon, of Sheck, Herndon Sheck, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson, Herman T. Reiling, Claude R. Marshall, Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky and David O. Walter, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On petition of the taxpayer, we have reviewed the decision of the Tax Court of the United States holding deficiencies in income tax of the petitioner for its fiscal years 1950 and 1951; and upon the basis of the findings of fact of the tax court, which are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and for the reasons stated in its opinion reported in26 T.C. 953, the decision of the tax court is affirmed.