Opinion · Nylaw New York

FISHER v. COOPER, 261 App. Div. 1087 (1941)

ALEX. FISHER, Plaintiff, v. TUCKER COOPER & Others, Defendants; NATHANBAUM, Appellant.EDMUND BARTELS, JR., Receiver-Respondent., 261 A.D. 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1941)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1941-04-14
Topic: general

FISHER v. COOPER, 261 App. Div. 1087 (1941) ALEX. FISHER, Plaintiff, v. TUCKER COOPER and Others, Defendants; NATHANBAUM, Appellant.EDMUND BARTELS, JR., Receiver-Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FISHER v. COOPER, 261 App. Div. 1087 (1941). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FISHER v. COOPER,261 App. Div. 1087(1941)

ALEX. FISHER, Plaintiff, v. TUCKER COOPER and Others, Defendants; NATHAN

BAUM, Appellant.

EDMUND BARTELS, JR., Receiver-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

April 14, 1941.

Action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. Order directing the owner to attorn to the receiver and pay a reasonable rental for the occupation of a portion of the mortgaged premises, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.Page 1088