Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

FEIGENSON v. FEIGENSON, 42 N.J. 290 (1964)

ARTHUR H. FEIGENSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. CHARLES S.FEIGENSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS., 200 A.2d 125 (N.J. 1964)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1964-04-27
Topic: general

FEIGENSON v. FEIGENSON, 42 N.J. 290 (1964) 200 A.2d 125 ARTHUR H. FEIGENSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. CHARLES S.FEIGENSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 27, 1964.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FEIGENSON v. FEIGENSON, 42 N.J. 290 (1964). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FEIGENSON v. FEIGENSON,42 N.J. 290(1964)

200 A.2d 125

ARTHUR H. FEIGENSON,ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. CHARLES S.

FEIGENSON,ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

April 27, 1964.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Isadore GlaubermanandMr. Sheldon A. Weissfor the petitioners.Messrs. McCarter English, Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr.andMr.Michael D. Lopretefor the respondents.

Denied.