Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

FARMERS MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK v. BOARDWALK NATL. BK., 52 N.J. 492 (1968)

FARMERS & MERCHANTS Nat’l BANK OF BRIDGETON, NEW JERSEY,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARDWALK Nat’l BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ANDHAMMONTON Inv. & Mortg. CO., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER., 52 N.J. 492 (N.J. 1968)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1968-09-17
Topic: general

FARMERS MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK v. BOARDWALK NATL. BK., 52 N.J. 492 (1968) THE FARMERS AND MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF BRIDGETON, NEW JERSEY,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARDWALK NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ANDHAMMONTON INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE CO., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 17, 1968.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FARMERS MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK v. BOARDWALK NATL. BK., 52 N.J. 492 (1968). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FARMERS MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK v. BOARDWALK NATL. BK.,52 N.J. 492(1968)

THE FARMERS AND MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF BRIDGETON, NEW JERSEY,

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARDWALK NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND

HAMMONTON INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE CO., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

September 17, 1968.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Clarence Blitzfor the petitioner.Messrs. Kirkman, Mulligan, Bell Armstrong, andMr. SamuelJ. Seratafor the respondents.

Denied.Page 493