Opinion · Nylaw New York

ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC. v. FISCHER, 267 App. Div. 756 (1943)

ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC., Appellant, v. ANNA FISCHER et al., Defendants,and HELEN GERSHOWITZ et al., as Ex’[r, x]s & Trs. under the Will ofHIMAN FISCHER, Deceased, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 267 A.D. 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1943-12-10
Topic: general

ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC. v. FISCHER, 267 App. Div. 756 (1943) ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC., Appellant, v. ANNA FISCHER et al., Defendants,and HELEN GERSHOWITZ et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will ofHIMAN FISCHER, Deceased, et al., Defendants-Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. December 10, 1943.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC. v. FISCHER, 267 App. Div. 756 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC. v. FISCHER,267 App. Div. 756(1943)

ELMS STEAKS CHOPS, INC., Appellant, v. ANNA FISCHER et al., Defendants,

and HELEN GERSHOWITZ et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of

HIMAN FISCHER, Deceased, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 10, 1943.

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs and the ten dollars costs awarded at Special Term. No opinion.

Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the cross motion to dismiss. [Seepost, p. 807.]