Opinion · Nylaw New York

EGGEBRECHT v. HERMELIN, 278 App. Div. 696 (1951)

WILLIAM EGGEBRECHT, Respondent, v. MARK HERMELIN, Appellant., 278 A.D. 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1951-03-27
Topic: general

EGGEBRECHT v. HERMELIN, 278 App. Div. 696 (1951) WILLIAM EGGEBRECHT, Respondent, v. MARK HERMELIN, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. March 27, 1951.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EGGEBRECHT v. HERMELIN, 278 App. Div. 696 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EGGEBRECHT v. HERMELIN,278 App. Div. 696(1951)

WILLIAM EGGEBRECHT, Respondent, v. MARK HERMELIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

March 27, 1951.

Order, so far as appealed from by defendant, unanimously modified by striking out the conditions for the payment by defendant of plaintiff's costs and disbursements and directing plaintiff to appear for examination at Special Term, Part II, on a subsequent date to be fixed in the order herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Settle order on notice.

Present — Glennon, J.P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.