Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

EDWARDS v. ADERHOLD, 73 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1934)

Edison J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. A.C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United StatesPenitentiary, Atlanta, Ga., Appellee., 73 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1934-12-21
Topic: general

EDWARDS v. ADERHOLD, 73 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1934) Edison J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. A.C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United StatesPenitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EDWARDS v. ADERHOLD, 73 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EDWARDS v. ADERHOLD,73 F.2d 997(5th Cir. 1934)

Edison J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. A.C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States

Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.

No. 7601.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 21, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; E. Marvin Underwood, Judge.

In forma pauperis.

Edison J. Edwards, in pro. per.

Lawrence S. Camp, U.S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Carrollton, Ga., and H.T. Nichols, Sp. Asst. to U.S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Knewel v. Egan,268 U.S. 442,45 S. Ct. 522,69 L. Ed. 1036; Pellegrino v. Aderhold (C.C.A.)55 F.2d 1074; Aderhold v. Hugart (C.C.A.)67 F.2d 247, the judgment is affirmed.Page 998