Opinion · Milaw Michigan
EASTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CO. v. LONG, 463 Mich. 919 (2000)
EASTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CO., OAK Distrib. CO., INC., HUBERT DISTRIBUTORS,INC., POWERS Distrib., INC., & DON LEE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRED R. LONG, W.C. THOMAS, BRIAN AHEARN, PATJORDAN, STRINGARI, FRITZ, KREGER, AHEARN CRANDALL, P.C., KECK, MAHIN CATE, THE Am. CONSULTING Grp., INC., & W. COAST INDUSTRIALRELATIONS Ass’n, INC., Defendants, & McLAUGHLIN IRVIN,Defendant-Appellee.,
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Milaw Michigan
- Jurisdiction
- Milaw
- Date
- 2000-11-29
- Topic
- general
EASTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CO. v. LONG, 463 Mich. 919 (2000) 620 N.W.2d 306 EASTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CO., OAK DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., HUBERT DISTRIBUTORS,INC., POWERS DISTRIBUTING, INC., and DON LEE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRED R. LONG, W.C. THOMAS, BRIAN AHEARN, PATJORDAN, STRINGARI, FRITZ, KREGER, AHEARN CRANDALL, P.C., KECK, MAHIN CATE, THE AMERICAN CONSULTING GROUP, INC., and WEST COAST INDUSTRIALRELATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants, and McLAUGHLIN IRVIN,Defendant-Appellee.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed EASTOWN DISTRIBUTORS CO. v. LONG, 463 Mich. 919 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 11, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.