Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

DYLL v. BELL TELEPHONE CO., 524 Pa. 329 (1990)

572 A.2d 1

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
1990-03-01
Topic
general

DYLL v. BELL TELEPHONE CO., 524 Pa. 329 (1990) 572 A.2d 1 Louise Ann DYLL and Robert A. Dyll, her husband, Petitioners, v. The BELLTELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA and Nationwide Insurance Company,Respondents.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. March 1, 1990.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DYLL v. BELL TELEPHONE CO., 524 Pa. 329 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DYLL v. BELL TELEPHONE CO.,524 Pa. 329(1990)
572 A.2d 1
Louise Ann DYLL and Robert A. Dyll, her husband, Petitioners, v. The BELL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA and Nationwide Insurance Company,
Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 1, 1990.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 304 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1989 from the Order of the Superior Court dated May 10, 1989 at No. 1251 Pittsburgh, 1988,391 Pa. Super. 644,563 A.2d 197, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division, entered July 26, 1988.Page 330
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this first day of March, 1990, the order entered January 5, 1990,524 Pa. 608,569 A.2d 1367, denying the petition for allowance of appeal in the above captioned matter is hereby VACATED. The petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED and is to be CONSOLIDATED withJames Hackenberg v.Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, andPennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, andTravelers Insurance Company,524 Pa. 597,568 A.2d 1247for argument.