Opinion · Molaw Missouri

DOUGHERTY v. CITY OF CLAYTON, 14 S.W.3d 663 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000)

14 S.W.3d 663

Type
Opinion
Court
Molaw Missouri
Jurisdiction
Molaw
Date
2000-03-21
Topic
general

DOUGHERTY v. CITY OF CLAYTON, 14 S.W.3d 663 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000) TERRANCE W. DOUGHERTY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS v. CITY OF CLAYTON,MISSOURI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS. No.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DOUGHERTY v. CITY OF CLAYTON, 14 S.W.3d 663 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DOUGHERTY v. CITY OF CLAYTON,14 S.W.3d 663(Mo.App.E.D. 2000)
TERRANCE W. DOUGHERTY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS v. CITY OF CLAYTON,
MISSOURI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.
No. ED76424
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,
Division One.
March 21, 2000
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLEKENNETH M. ROMINES.
Timothy J. Tryniecki, Thomas B. Weaver, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP,One Metropolitan Square, Suite 2600, St. Louis, MO 63102-2740, forappellant.Helmut Starr, Lisa S. Leary, Deborah Potter Wilkins, 7733 ForsythBlvd., 12th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105, Joseph Vincent Keady, Jr.,Cynthia Ann Sciuto, 168 North Meramec, Suite 400, St. Louis, MO63105, for respondent.
Before GAERTNER, P.J. and SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
[1]
ORDER
PER CURIAM
[2] Appellants, citizens of the City of Clayton, appeal a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County upholding the Clayton Board of Alderman's grant of a conditional use permit to Fontbonne College for the construction of a parking lot.

[3] We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)