Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

DOE BY DOE v. COM., STATE BD. OF EDUC., 509 Pa. 495 (1986)

503 A.2d 931

Type: Opinion
Court: Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Palaw
Date: 1986-01-31
Topic: general

DOE BY DOE v. COM., STATE BD. OF EDUC., 509 Pa. 495 (1986) 503 A.2d 931 Student DOE, a Minor, by M. DOE, her Guardian, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTHof Pennsylvania, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,Department of Education, Robert C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DOE BY DOE v. COM., STATE BD. OF EDUC., 509 Pa. 495 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DOE BY DOE v. COM., STATE BD. OF EDUC.,509 Pa. 495(1986)

503 A.2d 931

Student DOE, a Minor, by M. DOE, her Guardian, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH

of Pennsylvania, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,

Department of Education, Robert C. Wilburn, Secretary of Education, and

Bensalem Township School District.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 21, 1986.

Decided January 31, 1986.

Appeal No. 56 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1985 from Order of Commonwealth Court entered April 12, 1985 at No. 1354 C.D. 1984.

Doris Applebaum, Cornwells Heights, for appellant.

David M. Donaldson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Philadelphia, for appellee.

James M. McMaster, Newtown, for Bensalem Twp. School Dist.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1986, this Court, sua sponte, quashes the appeal in the above matter. Record costs to be paid by appellant pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2741(1).Page 496