Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 348 (2002)

561 S.E.2d 498

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
2002-01-01
Topic
general

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 348 (2002) 561 S.E.2d 498Supreme Court of North Carolina 2002 ANDERSON v. ASSIMOS No. 621A01 Case below: 146 N.C. App. 339 Notice of appeal by defendants pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) retained 6 March 2002. COUCH v. PRIVATE DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC No. 661P01 Case below: 146 N.C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 348 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,355 N.C. 348(2002)
561 S.E.2d 498
Supreme Court of North Carolina
2002
ANDERSON v. ASSIMOS

No. 621A01

Case below:146 N.C. App. 339

Notice of appeal by defendants pursuant to G.S.7A-30(substantial constitutional question) retained 6 March 2002.

COUCH v. PRIVATE DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC

No. 661P01

Case below:146 N.C. App. 658

Motion by appellee (Trial Court) to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 2002. Petition by appellant (Maria Sperando) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 April 2002. Conditional petition by appellee (Trial Court) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31dismissed as moot 4 April 2002.

DOYLE v. ASHEVILLE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCS.

No. 62P02

Case below: 148 NC. App. ___ (28 December 2001)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 April 2002.

GASTON CTY. v. SANDERS

No. 31P02

Case below: 147 N.C. App. ___ (18 December 2001)

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 2002.

GOODWIN v. SCHNEIDER NAT'L, INC.

No. 181P99
Case below:132 N.C. App. 585353 N.C. 523


Petition by plaintiff to reconsider denial of petition for discretionary review dismissed 12 March 2002.Page 349