Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 351 N.C. 360 (2000)

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 351 N.C. 360 (2000), 351 N.C. 360 (N.C. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
2000-01-01
Topic
general

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 351 N.C. 360 (2000)Supreme Court of North Carolina 2000 RHONEY v. FELE No. 441P99 Case below: 134 N.C. App. 614 Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31 denied 3 February 2000. RISSOLO v. SLOOP No. 520P99 Case below: 135 N.C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 351 N.C. 360 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,351 N.C. 360(2000)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
2000
RHONEY v. FELE

No. 441P99

Case below:134 N.C. App. 614

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 3 February 2000.

RISSOLO v. SLOOP

No. 520P99

Case below: 135 N.C. App. ___ (5 October 1999)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 3 February 2000.

RUSH v. EMPLOYERS INS. OF WAUSAU

No. 540P98

Case below:131 N.C. App. 554

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 2 March 2000. Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 March 2000.

SCHOOLER v. KENNEDY

No. 486P99

Case below: 135 N.C. App. ___ (5 October 1999)

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 3 February 2000.

STATE v. ATKINSON

No. 570P99

Case below: 135 N.C. App. ___ (16 November 1999)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 2 March 2000.Page 361