Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 88 Ohio St.3d 1425 (2000)

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 88 Ohio St.3d 1425 (2000), 723 N.E.2d 1113 (Ohio 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 2000-01-01
Topic: general

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 88 Ohio St.3d 1425 (2000) 723 N.E.2d 1113Supreme Court of Ohio. 2000. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED99-2168. State v. Getsy. Trumbull App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 88 Ohio St.3d 1425 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE,88 Ohio St.3d 1425(2000)

723 N.E.2d 1113

Supreme Court of Ohio.

2000.

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL

QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED
99-2168. State v. Getsy.

Trumbull App. No. 98-T-0140.99-2169. State v. Stroud.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74756.99-2181. State v. Mack.

Cuyahoga App. No. 75086.99-2191. State v. Reynolds.

Summit App. No. 19062.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.99-2194. State v. Zimmer.

Cuyahoga App. No. 75138.99-2195. Crafton v. Chemstation.

Montgomery App. Nos. 17736 and 17826.99-2198. State v. Bates.

Cuyahoga App. No. 76251.99-2221. State v. Jennings.

Richland App. No. 98CA114.00-4. State v. Williams.

Summit App. No. 19437.