Opinion · Milaw Michigan

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG, 471 Mich. 937 (2004)

Dep’t OF CIVIL Rts. ex rel BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG OF DETROIT., 690 N.W.2d 99 (Mich. 2004)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2004-12-27
Topic: general

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG, 471 Mich. 937 (2004) 690 N.W.2d 99 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS ex rel BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG OF DETROIT. No. 126254.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2004.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG, 471 Mich. 937 (2004). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG,471 Mich. 937(2004)

690 N.W.2d 99

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS ex rel BURNSIDE v. FASHION BUG OF DETROIT.

No. 126254.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 27, 2004.

SC: 126254, COA: 240325.Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Applicationfor Leave to Appeal.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), the clerk is to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptoryPage 938action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order.