Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

DECKER v. NASH, 105 N.J.L. 488 (1929)

HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL.,RESPONDENT., 144 A. 918 (Ct. Err. & App. 1929)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1929-02-04
Topic
general

DECKER v. NASH, 105 N.J.L. 488 (1929) 144 A. 918 HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL.,RESPONDENT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued October 24, 1928 — Decided February 4, 1929. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DECKER v. NASH, 105 N.J.L. 488 (1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DECKER v. NASH,105 N.J.L. 488(1929)
144 A. 918
HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL.,
RESPONDENT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Argued October 24, 1928 —
Decided February 4, 1929.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whoseper curiamis printed in6 N.J. Mis. R. 503.
For the appellant,Earl A. Merrill.

For the respondent,Paul Q. Oliver.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.For reversal— None.Page 489