Opinion · Txlaw Texas

CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO., 192 S.W. 792 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1917)

CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO., 192 S.W. 792 (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. 1917)

Type
Opinion
Court
Txlaw Texas
Jurisdiction
Txlaw
Date
1917-02-22
Topic
general

CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO., 192 S.W. 792 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1917) CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO., 192 S.W. 792 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1917). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO.,192 S.W. 792(Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1917)
CUMMENS v. OWEN BROS. CONST. CO.
No. 1760.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.
February 22, 1917.
Appeal from District Court, Fannin County; Ben H. Denton, Judge.

Action by E. F. Cummens against the Owen Bros. Construction Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Appellee, having contracted with Fannin county to construct a road for the use of the public employed one Larrimore and his associates to construct a part of it. This was a suit by appellant against appellee for damages for personal injury which he claimed he suffered as a result of the negligent manner, as he alleged, in which said part of the road was constructed. After hearing the testimony, the trial court instructed the jury to find in appellee's favor, on the ground that Larrimore and his associates were independent contractors for whose negligence appellee was not liable to appellant. The appeal is from a judgment based on a verdict conforming to such instruction.
Hous Lee and H. G. Evans, both of Bonham, for appellant. Cunningham McMahon, of Bonham, for appellee.
WILLSON, C. J. (after stating the facts as above).
The assignments based on the action of the court in giving and refusing instructions are overruled. It does not appear that appellant excepted to the action of the court in those particulars. Therefore hePage 793is in the attitude of having approved at the trial the rulings complained of in said assignments. Articles 1971 and 2061, Vernon's Statutes; Palmer v. Logan,189 S.W. 761.

The only other assignment in appellant's brief is one in which he complains because the court excluded as evidence a clause in the contract between appellee and Fannin county as follows:

"The contractor [appellee] hereby assumes all risk and liability for accidents and damages that may accrue to persons or property during the prosecution of the work by reason of the negligence or carelessness of himself, his agents or employes."

Had appellant been a party to the contract, or for any other reason entitled to invoke the stipulation set out, and he was not, it would not have helped his case; for he was not injured "during the prosecution of the work" of constructing the road, but after it was completed and because of a defect in it as completed.

The judgment is affirmed.