Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

COOS HEAD TIMBER CO. v. TAX COMM., 255 Or. 1 (1970)

463 P.2d 569

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1970-01-14
Topic
general

COOS HEAD TIMBER CO. v. TAX COMM., 255 Or. 1 (1970) 463 P.2d 569 COOS HEAD TIMBER COMPANY, Respondent, v. STATE TAX COMMISSION, Appellant.Oregon Supreme Court.Argued September 9, 1969, Affirmed January 14, 1970 IN BANC Appeal from Oregon Tax Court. (No. 328) EDWARD H. HOWELL, Judge.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COOS HEAD TIMBER CO. v. TAX COMM., 255 Or. 1 (1970). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COOS HEAD TIMBER CO. v. TAX COMM.,255 Or. 1(1970)
463 P.2d 569
COOS HEAD TIMBER COMPANY,Respondent,v. STATE TAX COMMISSION,Appellant.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Argued September 9, 1969,
Affirmed January 14, 1970
IN BANC
Appeal from Oregon Tax Court. (No. 328)

EDWARD H. HOWELL, Judge.
Theodore W. de Looze, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and G.F. Bartz, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.Joseph McKeown, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were McKeown, Newhouse Johansen, Coos Bay.
Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN,fn*DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.
AFFIRMED.Page 2
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the Oregon Tax Court,3 OTR 143, which involves the valuation of the plaintiff's Bunker Hill Sawmill and its related facilities, located in Coos County, for the tax year 1965-1966.

We have carefully examined the facts and issues involved and have reached the conclusion that the decision of the tax court should be affirmed.

Since the opinion of the tax court clearly sets forth the facts and issues of law, we find it unnecessary to add thereto. We adopt the opinion of the Oregon Tax Court as our own.

Judgment affirmed.Page 3
  1. Goodwin, J., resigned December 19, 1969. ↩