Opinion · Nylaw New York

COOPER v. WISSELTHIER, 134 App. Div. 966 (1909)

Hene Cooper, Respondent, v. Jossef Wisselthier & Others, Defendants.Gustav Lange, a Party Interested, Appellant; Samuel Stark, as Receiver,Respondent., 134 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1909)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1909-01-01
Topic: general

COOPER v. WISSELTHIER, 134 App. Div. 966 (1909) Hene Cooper, Respondent, v. Jossef Wisselthier and Others, Defendants.Gustav Lange, a Party Interested, Appellant; Samuel Stark, as Receiver,Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. November, 1909.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COOPER v. WISSELTHIER, 134 App. Div. 966 (1909). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COOPER v. WISSELTHIER,134 App. Div. 966(1909)

Hene Cooper, Respondent, v. Jossef Wisselthier and Others, Defendants.

Gustav Lange, a Party Interested, Appellant; Samuel Stark, as Receiver,

Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

November, 1909.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice.