Opinion · Nylaw New York

COOPER v. ROCHESTER ICE CREAM COMPANY, 152 App. Div. 900 (1912)

Bert F. Cooper, Respondent, v. Rochester Ice Cream Co., Appellant,Impleaded with Samuel T. Nivling., 152 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1912)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1912-01-01
Topic: general

COOPER v. ROCHESTER ICE CREAM COMPANY, 152 App. Div. 900 (1912) Bert F. Cooper, Respondent, v. Rochester Ice Cream Company, Appellant,Impleaded with Samuel T.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COOPER v. ROCHESTER ICE CREAM COMPANY, 152 App. Div. 900 (1912). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COOPER v. ROCHESTER ICE CREAM COMPANY,152 App. Div. 900(1912)

Bert F. Cooper, Respondent, v. Rochester Ice Cream Company, Appellant,

Impleaded with Samuel T. Nivling.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

July, 1912.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented upon the ground that the writing was not libelousper seand that there is no proof of actual damages.