Opinion · Nylaw New York

CONWAY v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION, 268 App. Div. 974 (1944)

ADELE CONWAY, as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of JAMES CONWAY, Deceased,Respondent, v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING Corp. et al., Appellants., 268 A.D. 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1944)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1944-12-15
Topic: general

CONWAY v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION, 268 App. Div. 974 (1944) ADELE CONWAY, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES CONWAY, Deceased,Respondent, v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION et al., Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. December 15, 1944.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CONWAY v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION, 268 App. Div. 974 (1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CONWAY v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION,268 App. Div. 974(1944)

ADELE CONWAY, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES CONWAY, Deceased,

Respondent, v. ROYAL BLUE SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 15, 1944.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [Seepost, p. 1039.]Page 975