Opinion · Nylaw New York

COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND v. HUMM, 269 App. Div. 657 (1945)

COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE Ins. FUND, Respondents, v. JOHN HUMM, JR.,as Ex’[r, x] of JOHN HUMM, SR., Defendant, & E.W. BLISS CO., Appellant., 269 A.D. 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1945)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1945-02-16
Topic: general

COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND v. HUMM, 269 App. Div. 657 (1945) COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, Respondents, v. JOHN HUMM, JR.,as Executor of JOHN HUMM, SR., Defendant, and E.W. BLISS CO., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND v. HUMM, 269 App. Div. 657 (1945). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND v. HUMM,269 App. Div. 657(1945)

COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, Respondents, v. JOHN HUMM, JR.,

as Executor of JOHN HUMM, SR., Defendant, and E.W. BLISS CO., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

February 16, 1945.

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. No opinion.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ. [Seepost, p. 690.]