Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SER. v. YOUTH CHALLENGE, 20 Conn. App. 806 (1989)

Comm’r OF HEALTH SERVICES v. YOUTH CHALLENGE OF GREATER HARTFORD,INC., 567 A.2d 849 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1989-11-14
Topic: general

COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SER. v. YOUTH CHALLENGE, 20 Conn. App. 806 (1989) 567 A.2d 849 COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SERVICES v. YOUTH CHALLENGE OF GREATER HARTFORD,INC., ET AL. (7661)Appellate Court of Connecticut DALY, FOTI and LAVERY, Js.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SER. v. YOUTH CHALLENGE, 20 Conn. App. 806 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SER. v. YOUTH CHALLENGE,20 Conn. App. 806(1989)

567 A.2d 849

COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH SERVICESv.YOUTH CHALLENGE OF GREATER HARTFORD,

INC., ET AL.

(7661)

Appellate Court of Connecticut

DALY, FOTI and LAVERY, Js.

Argued November 3, 1989

Decision released November 14, 1989

Action to enjoin the defendants from operating two unlicensed health care facilities, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, and tried to the court, M. Hennessey, J.; partial judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court which affirmed the judgment of the trial court; thereafter,Page 807the trial court, Satter, J., granted the plaintiff's motion for Contempt, and the defendants appealed to this court. No error.

James W. Sherman, for the appellants (defendants).

Maite Barainca, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, attorney general, and Robert E. Walsh and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorneys general, for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

There is no error.Page 807