Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OPP. v. SULLIVAN ASSOC., 251 Conn. 924 (1999)

Comm’n ON Hum. Rts. & OPPORTUNITIES v. SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES, 742 A.2d 364 (Conn. 1999)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1999-12-21
Topic: general

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OPP. v. SULLIVAN ASSOC., 251 Conn. 924 (1999) 742 A.2d 364 COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES v. SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES (SC 16042)Supreme Court of Connecticut The motion by the defendant Sullivan Asociates for reargument or reargument en banc of this court's decision in Commission on Human Rights Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763, 739 A.2d 238 (1999) is denied. McDONALD, C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OPP. v. SULLIVAN ASSOC., 251 Conn. 924 (1999). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OPP. v. SULLIVAN ASSOC.,251 Conn. 924(1999)

742 A.2d 364

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIESv.SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES

(SC 16042)

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The motion by the defendant Sullivan Asociates for reargument or reargument en banc of this court's decision inCommission on Human Rights Opportunitiesv.Sullivan Associates,250 Conn. 763,739 A.2d 238(1999) is denied.

McDONALD, C. J., dissenting.

I dissent from the vote denying reargument in this case for the reasons stated in my dissent published inCommissionon Human Rights Opportunitiesv.Sullivan Associates,250 Conn. 763,739 A.2d 238(1999). I wish to note that the vote on this motion making a vast change in the law of property and landlord and tenant was five to four.James H. Lee, in support of the motion.Raymond P. PechandDavid S. Stowe, in opposition.

Decided December 21, 1999