Opinion · Nylaw New York

COLUCCIO v. STOCKER, 266 App. Div. 974 (1943)

JOSEPH COLUCCIO, an Infant, by FRANK COLUCCIO, His Guardian ad Litem, etal., Respondents, v. FRED STOCKER et al., Appellants., 266 A.D. 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1943-10-18
Topic: general

COLUCCIO v. STOCKER, 266 App. Div. 974 (1943) JOSEPH COLUCCIO, an Infant, by FRANK COLUCCIO, His Guardian ad Litem, etal., Respondents, v. FRED STOCKER et al., Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. October 18, 1943.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COLUCCIO v. STOCKER, 266 App. Div. 974 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COLUCCIO v. STOCKER,266 App. Div. 974(1943)

JOSEPH COLUCCIO, an Infant, by FRANK COLUCCIO, His Guardian ad Litem, et

al., Respondents, v. FRED STOCKER et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 18, 1943.

Action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by his father for medical expenses and loss of services. Order granting plaintiffs' motion for an examination of certain witnesses before trial, pursuant to section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the examinationPage 975to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion. Close, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.