Opinion · Milaw Michigan

CODDINGTON v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES, INC., 474 Mich. 937 (2005)

THOMAS CODDINGTON, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES,INC., & 2468 ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, & GARY H. CUNNINGHAM,Appellant., 706 N.W.2d 14 (Mich. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2005-11-29
Topic: general

CODDINGTON v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES, INC., 474 Mich. 937 (2005) 706 N.W.2d 14 THOMAS CODDINGTON, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES,INC., and 2468 ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and GARY H. CUNNINGHAM,Appellant. No. 128967.Supreme Court of Michigan.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CODDINGTON v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES, INC., 474 Mich. 937 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CODDINGTON v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES, INC.,474 Mich. 937(2005)

706 N.W.2d 14

THOMAS CODDINGTON, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SPECIALIZED VEHICLES,

INC., and 2468 ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and GARY H. CUNNINGHAM,

Appellant.

No. 128967.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 29, 2005.

SC: 128967, COA: 260269, Oakland CC: 2000-026955-CK.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.