Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. KANE, 319 Fed.Appx. 645 (9th Cir. 2009)

CHRISTIAN LEGAL Soc’y CHAPTER OF U. (periodical titles) OF Cal., HastingsCollege of the L., aka Hastings Christian Fellowship,Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, in her Off. capacity asChancellor & Dean of U. (periodical titles) of Cal., Hastings Coll. of theLaw; Judy Chapman, in her Off. capacity as Dir. of StudentServices for U. (periodical titles) of Cal., Hastings Coll. of the Law;Maureen E

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2009-03-17
Topic
general

CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. KANE, 319 Fed.Appx. 645 (9th Cir. 2009) CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HastingsCollege of the Law, aka Hastings Christian Fellowship,Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, in her official capacity asChancellor and Dean of University of California, Hastings College of theLaw; Judy Chapman, in her official capacity as Director of StudentServices for University of California, Hastings College of the Law;Maureen E. Corcoran; Eugene L. Freeland; Carin T.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. KANE, 319 Fed.Appx. 645 (9th Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. KANE,319 Fed.Appx. 645(9th Cir. 2009)
CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Hastings
College of the Law, aka Hastings Christian Fellowship,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, in her official capacity as
Chancellor and Dean of University of California, Hastings College of the
Law; Judy Chapman, in her official capacity as Director of Student
Services for University of California, Hastings College of the Law;
Maureen E. Corcoran; Eugene L. Freeland; Carin T. Fujisaki; John T. Knox;
Jan Lewenhaupt; James E. Mahoney; Brian D. Monaghan; Bruce L. Simon; John
K. Smith; Tony West, in their official capacities as the Board of
Directors of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law,
Defendants-Appellees, Hastings Outlaw, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.
No. 06-15956.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009.
Filed March 17, 2009.
Gregory Baylor, Center for Law Religious Freedom, Timothy J. Tracey, Litigation Counsel, Religious Liberty Advocates of the Christian Legal Society, Springfield, VA, Benjamin Wyman Bull, Esquire, Chief Counsel, Gary McCaleb, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ, Steven R. Burlingham, Esquire, Gary Till Burlingham, Timothy M. Smith, Esquire, McKinley Smith A Professional Corporation, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ethan P. Schulman, Esquire, Folger Levin Kahn, LLP, Elise K. Traynum, Esquire, General Counsel Mezzanine Level, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Shannon Minter, Esquire, National Center for Lesbian Rights, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-04484-JSW.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HUG and BEA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUMfn*
The parties stipulate that Hastings imposes an open membership rule on all student groups — all groups must accept all comers as voting members even if thosePage 646individuals disagree with the mission of the group. The conditions on recognition are therefore viewpoint neutral and reasonable.Truth v. Kent Sch. Dist.,542 F.3d 634,649-50(9th Cir. 2008).AFFIRMED.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩
  2. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ↩