Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CERCIELLO v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., 137 N.J.L. 300 (1948)

ANGELO CERCIELLO, APPELLANT, v. Metro. LIFE Ins. CO., RESPONDENT., 59 A.2d 623 (Ct. Err. & App. 1948)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1948-05-13
Topic
general

CERCIELLO v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., 137 N.J.L. 300 (1948) 59 A.2d 623 ANGELO CERCIELLO, APPELLANT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted February 13, 1948 — Decided May 13, 1948. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at135 N.J.L. 342. For the appellant, Joseph C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CERCIELLO v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., 137 N.J.L. 300 (1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CERCIELLO v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.,137 N.J.L. 300(1948)
59 A.2d 623
ANGELO CERCIELLO, APPELLANT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted February 13, 1948 —
Decided May 13, 1948.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at135 N.J.L. 342.
For the appellant,Joseph C. Cassini(Lawrence Friedman, of counsel).

For the respondent,McCarter, English Studer.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, HEHER, COLIE, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 12.For reversal— WACHENFELD, J. 1.Page 301