Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 99 N.C. App. 773 (1990)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 99 N.C. App. 773 (1990), 99 N.C. App. 773 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1990-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 99 N.C. App. 773 (1990)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 7 August 1990 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 7 AUGUST 1990 BRADLEY LUMBER CO. v. McDowell New Trial HARRIS-TEETER (87CVS372) SUPERMARKETS No. 8929SC1184 BRADY v. LAWSON Davidson Dismissed No. 9022SC125 (87CVS1280) BRITT v. BRITT Orange Affirmed in No. 8915SC563 (83CVS321) part, reversed in part remanded CARVER v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 99 N.C. App. 773 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,99 N.C. App. 773(1990)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 7 August 1990


FILED 7 AUGUST 1990

BRADLEY LUMBER CO. v. McDowell New Trial HARRIS-TEETER (87CVS372) SUPERMARKETS No. 8929SC1184

BRADY v. LAWSON Davidson Dismissed No. 9022SC125 (87CVS1280)

BRITT v. BRITT Orange Affirmed in No. 8915SC563 (83CVS321) part, reversed in part remanded

CARVER v. SMART Catawba No Error No. 8925DC1169 (87CVD337)

GILMORE v. MOEBES Guilford Vacated No. 8918SC1093 (88CVS6048) remanded for trial

GRAHAM NEVILLE Johnston Affirmed ASSOCIATES v. PARRISH (89CVD741) No. 8911DC1177

GURGANUS v. GURGANUS Onslow Dismissed No. 904DC82 (86CVD278)

HUTCHENS v. HILL Yadkin Affirmed No. 8923DC1261 (88CVD282)

IN RE FORECLOSURE Jones Dismissed OF GREEN No. 894SC926 (87SP24) No. 894SC927 (87SP25) No. 894SC928 (87SP26)

IN RE GOLDEN RULE INS. CO. Wake Reversed v. N.C. DEPT. OF (89CVS2722) INSURANCE No. 8910SC863

LUPTON v. CITY OF Ind. Comm. Reversed GOLDSBORO (853100) Remanded No. 9010IC271

PLESS v. ARTIS Cabarrus New Trial No. 8919SC1231 (87CVS1601)

ROGERS v. INSUL PLUS CORP. Ind. Comm. Affirmed No. 9010IC114 (552271)Page 774
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩