Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 98 N.C. App. 155 (1990)

98 N.C. App. 155

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1990-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 98 N.C. App. 155 (1990)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 3 April 1990 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] STATE v. BRYANT Guilford No Error No. 8918SC746 (88CRS41557) (88CRS47564) STATE v. BUCHANAN Catawba STATE v. MORGAN (88CRS10998) No Error No. 8925SC933 (88CRS10999) Remanded for resentencing STATE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 98 N.C. App. 155 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,98 N.C. App. 155(1990)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 3 April 1990


STATE v. BRYANT Guilford No Error No. 8918SC746 (88CRS41557) (88CRS47564)

STATE v. BUCHANAN Catawba STATE v. MORGAN (88CRS10998) No Error No. 8925SC933 (88CRS10999) Remanded for resentencing

STATE v. BULLARD Forsyth No Error No. 8921SC757 (88CRS26859)

STATE v. CESAR Mecklenburg No Error No. 8926SC1046 (89CRS4620)

STATE v. CHANDLER Mecklenburg No Error No. 8926SC1070 (89CRS8242)

STATE v. FARMER Cumberland No Error No. 8912SC821 (88CRS1790)

STATE v. FLOOD Gaston No Error No. 8927SC1066 (88CRS29011) (88CRS29013)

STATE v. FRANKS New Hanover No Error No. 895SC1059 (89CRS05923)

STATE v. FREY Cumberland New Trial No. 8912SC946 (88CRS29035) (88CRS29036)

STATE v. GALLMAN Rutherford No Error No. 8929SC1011 (89CRS0591)

STATE v. GANDY Forsyth No Error No. 8921SC795 (88CRS5353)

STATE v. GARY Forsyth No Error No. 8921SC736 (88CRS28208)

STATE v. HARLEY Mecklenburg No Error No. 8926SC1025 (89CRS2533)

STATE v. HUGHES Mecklenburg No Error No. 8926SC944 (88CRS6396)

STATE v. JONES Gaston No Error No. 8927SC1067 (88CRS4313) (88CRS4314)

STATE v. KING Wilkes Reversed No. 8923SC1008 (89CRS1883) Remanded (89CRS1902)

STATE v. LOCKLEAR Robeson No Error No. 8916SC1010 (88CRS400)Page 156
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩