Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 90 N.C. App. 611 (1988)
90 N.C. App. 611
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1988-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 90 N.C. App. 611 (1988)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 7 June 1988 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] CRIST v. ROYAL Onslow Appeal Dismissed No. 874SC1052 (87CVS1030) ELITE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Guilford Affirmed CENTRAL BUILDERS, INC. (83CVS5511) No. 8818SC75 GRIGGS v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 90 N.C. App. 611 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,90 N.C. App. 611(1988)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 7 June 1988
CRIST v. ROYAL Onslow Appeal Dismissed No. 874SC1052 (87CVS1030)
ELITE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Guilford Affirmed CENTRAL BUILDERS, INC. (83CVS5511) No. 8818SC75
GRIGGS v. Currituck Reversed and HARRIS-REID-CARPENTER (87CVS50) Remanded No. 871SC1024
GRIMES v. GRIMES Caldwell Affirmed No. 8825DC89 (84CVD961)
IN RE BEYER Watauga Dismissed No. 8824DC224 (85J42)
IN RE CHAAR Vance Dismissed No. 889DC201 (86CVD499)
IN RE DAVIS Swain Affirmed No. 8730SC748 (86CVS2)
IN RE GOODE Rutherford Affirmed No. 8729DC1181 (87J56)
JETSTREAM AERO SERVICES, New Hanover Appeal Dismissed INC. v. NEW HANOVER (87CVS2911) COUNTY No. 885SC10
MERRELL v. CASH FLOW Henderson Affirmed No. 8729SC1073 (86CVS911)
NANCE v. NEASHAM Macon Affirmed No. 8730SC1190 (84CVS211)
NCNB NATIONAL BANK v. RICE Forsyth Affirmed; No. 8821SC15 (86CVS2634) Certiorari denied
ROTHROCK v. TOWN OF New Hanover Affirmed CAROLINA BEACH (87CVS2940) No. 885SC169
STATE v. ADAMS Guilford New Trial No. 8818SC171 (87CRS38666)
STATE v. CALL Iredell No Error No. 8722SC1047 (86CRS14001) (86CRS14002) (86CRS14003) (86CRS14004) (86CRS14005) (86CRS14006) (86CRS14007) (86CRS14008) (86CRS14009) (86CRS14010)Page 612
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩