Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 49 N.C. App. 203 (1980)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 49 N.C. App. 203 (1980), 49 N.C. App. 203 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1980-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 49 N.C. App. 203 (1980)North Carolina Court of Appeals 1980 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 7 OCTOBER 1980 AUSTIN v. AUSTIN New Hanover Affirmed No. 805DC203 (77CVD1801) FOWLER v. FARLOW Moore Affirmed No. 8020DC385 (79CVD231) IN RE ALLISON KNITTING v. McDowell Affirmed ADDISON ESC (79CVS145) No. 8029SC158 IN RE BLOSSOM Cumberland Affirmed No. 8012DC344 (79J859) IN RE MATTHEWS Cumberland Affirmed No. 8012DC379 (79J859) MOSS v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 49 N.C. App. 203 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,49 N.C. App. 203(1980)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
1980


FILED 7 OCTOBER 1980

AUSTIN v. AUSTIN New Hanover Affirmed No. 805DC203 (77CVD1801)

FOWLER v. FARLOW Moore Affirmed No. 8020DC385 (79CVD231)

IN RE ALLISON KNITTING v. McDowell Affirmed ADDISON ESC (79CVS145) No. 8029SC158

IN RE BLOSSOM Cumberland Affirmed No. 8012DC344 (79J859)

IN RE MATTHEWS Cumberland Affirmed No. 8012DC379 (79J859)

MOSS v. MOSS Durham Affirmed in part, No. 8014DC378 (79CVD350) Vacated in part, and Remanded

PENLAND v. CAMERON BROWN Buncombe Dismissed No. 8028SC346 (79CVS1025)

PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS Durham Affirmed in part, No. 8014DC262 (79CVD1251) Vacated and Remanded in part

SPICER v. SPECTOR FREIGHT Wilkes Reversed No. 7923SC432 (77CVS582) Remanded

STATE v. ALEXANDER Mecklenburg No Error No. 8026SC410 (79CRS32446) (79CRS32665) (79CRS32666)

STATE v. BROCK Cumberland No Error No. 8012SC292 (78CRS59821)

STATE v. BRUTON Lenoir No Error No. 808SC425 (79CRS10263)

STATE v. CONNER Gaston No Error No. 8027SC415 (79CRS8370)Page 204
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩