Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 117 N.C. App. 732 (1995)
117 N.C. App. 732
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1995-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 117 N.C. App. 732 (1995)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 7 February 1995 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, FILED 7 FEBRUARY 1995 JACKSON v. SIGNAL DELIVERY Ind. Comm. Affirmed SERVICE (088263) No. 94-799 KELTZ v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 117 N.C. App. 732 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,117 N.C. App. 732(1995)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 7 February 1995
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, FILED 7 FEBRUARY 1995
JACKSON v. SIGNAL DELIVERY Ind. Comm. Affirmed SERVICE (088263) No. 94-799
KELTZ v. RICK SOLES Durham Affirmed PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (93CVD2753) No. 94-783
KENNEDY v. SCHOOLER Duplin Affirmed No. 94-331 (93CVD515)
MILLS v. MILLS Mecklenburg Dismissed No. 94-925 (93CVD2602RLH)
PENCE v. PENCE Mecklenburg Affirmed No. 94-381 (81CVD9899)
PITTMAN v. STACY Wake Affirmed No. 94-504 (93CVD5069)
SASSER v. SOUTHERLAND Wayne New Trial No. 94-273 (91CVS1640)
STANLEY v. BCJ TRUCKING CO. Ind. Comm. Affirmed No. 94-764 (101582)
STATE v. BELL Pitt No Error No. 94-784 (92CRS12536ET AL)
STATE v. CALES Guilford No Error No. 94-620 (93CRS49705)
STATE v. CAREW Wake No Error No. 94-465 (93CRS14793)
STATE v. COOPER Edgecombe Affirmed No. 94-568 (91CRS4620) (91CRS4621) (91CRS4622)
STATE v. GILLIS Wake No Error No. 94-894 (93CRS045383) (93CRS045384) (93CRS045385)
STATE v. HARRIS Guilford Dismissed No. 94-900 (91CRS58831)
STATE v. HUNTLEY Cabarrus No Error No. 94-626 (93CRS2010) (93CRS2011)
STATE v. JACKSON Wake No Error No. 94-637 (93CRS77317)(JAC) (93CRS77318)(JON) (93CRS78628)(SUT)Page 733
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩