Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 395 (1992)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 106 N.C. App. 395 (1992), 106 N.C. App. 395 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 395 (1992)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 19 May 1992 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] STATE v. BLAKE Stanly No Error No. 9120SC434 (90CRS3107) (90CRS5114) STATE v. DAVIS Cumberland No Error No. 9212SC92 (91CRS13547) STATE v. EVANS Cumberland Dismissed No. 9112SC1204 (90IFS13301) STATE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 106 N.C. App. 395 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,106 N.C. App. 395(1992)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 19 May 1992


STATE v. BLAKE Stanly No Error No. 9120SC434 (90CRS3107) (90CRS5114)

STATE v. DAVIS Cumberland No Error No. 9212SC92 (91CRS13547)

STATE v. EVANS Cumberland Dismissed No. 9112SC1204 (90IFS13301)

STATE v. HARRIS Guilford No Error No. 9218SC114 (89CRS74354)

STATE v. McRAE Guilford No Error No. 9218SC62 (88CRS41843) (88CRS41844)

STATE v. MOSELY Forsyth Remanded for No. 9121SC1297 (91CRS2656) resentencing (91CRS2657) (91CRS17207)

STATE v. SAUNDERS Guilford As to both Atkins No. 9118SC229 (88CRS61830) and Saunders, we (88CRS61833) find no error in (88CRS61878) the conviction and (88CRS61880) punishment for trafficking by possession but arrest judgment on the charges of possession with intent to sell. No. 88CRS61830 possession with intent to sell a controlled substance — arrested; No. 88CRS61833 trafficking in drugs — no error; No. 88CRS61878 possession with intent to sell a controlled substance — arrested; No. 88CRS61880 trafficking in drugs — no error.

STATE v. WELLS Buncombe Affirmed No. 9228SC153 (90CRS15767)Page 396
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩