Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION, 94 Or. App. 575 (1989)

94 Or. App. 575

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1989-01-04
Topic
general

CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION, 94 Or. App. 575 (1989) CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINIONOregon Court of Appeals. January 4, 1989. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] (767 P.2d 934) Atkins, Gary v. Maass (A48836) David, Mary L. v. Schiedler (A48699) Davis, Gary v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION, 94 Or. App. 575 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION,94 Or. App. 575(1989)
CASES AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION
Oregon Court of Appeals.
January 4, 1989.
(767 P.2d 934)
Atkins, Gary v. Maass (A48836)

David, Mary L. v. Schiedler (A48699)

Davis, Gary v. Oregon State Penitentiary (A43959),rev den308 Or. 33

Downs, Elizabeth Diane v. Schiedler (A47469),rev den307 Or. 571

Evans, Mary v. Schiedler (A48700)

Frederiks, dba Aurora Pacific Trucking v. Employment Division (A46169)

Guinn, Robert v. Oregon State Penitentiary (A48187),rev den307 Or. 611

Gysin, Michael v. Maass (A48714)

Howe v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation et al (A48240)

In the Matter of Hansen, Tammy L., a Child. State ex rel Juvenile Department of Lane County v. Hansen; In the Matter of Lolita A. Hansen, a Child. State ex rel Juvenile Department of Lane County v. Hansen (A43493/94),rev den307 Or. 719

Looney and Kiser v. Aho (A47733),rev den307 Or. 611

Marsh, Michael v. Maass (A48853)

Oceanlake Paving Company v. Timerline Contractors, Inc. (A46820)

Oregon Department of Transportation et al v. Ron Platt Mfg., Inc. and United Pacific Insurance Company (A47814)

Sahli, dba Sandy Jug Tavern v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission; Kelley v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission (A47621/22)

State v. Ramirez, Jose Antonio (A45591)

Steele, Edward v. Oregon State Penitentiary (A49123),rev den307 Or. 658

Wolf et al v. Jordan (A45963),rev den307 Or. 658Page 576
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩