Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA v. BROOKS BROS., 158 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1947)

BROOKS CLOTHING OF Cal., Ltd., Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKSBROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee., 158 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1947)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-01-09
Topic: general

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA v. BROOKS BROS., 158 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1947) BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKSBROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 11158.Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 9, 1947.Rehearing Denied February 10, 1947.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA v. BROOKS BROS., 158 F.2d 798 (9th Cir. 1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA v. BROOKS BROS.,158 F.2d 798(9th Cir. 1947)

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKS

BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 11158.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 9, 1947.

Rehearing Denied February 10, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

See also D.C., 5 F.R.D. 14.

Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich (60 F. Supp. 442) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.Page 799