Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

BRIDGETON v. JONES, 101 N.J.L. 205 (1925)

CITY OF BRIDGETON, RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS JONES, APPELLANT., 127 A. 924 (Ct. Err. & App. 1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1925-01-19
Topic
general

BRIDGETON v. JONES, 101 N.J.L. 205 (1925) 127 A. 924 CITY OF BRIDGETON, RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS JONES, APPELLANT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted November 7, 1924 — Decided January 19, 1925. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in100 N.J.L. 33. For the respondent, Walter H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BRIDGETON v. JONES, 101 N.J.L. 205 (1925). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BRIDGETON v. JONES,101 N.J.L. 205(1925)
127 A. 924
CITY OF BRIDGETON, RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS JONES, APPELLANT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted November 7, 1924 —
Decided January 19, 1925.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in100 N.J.L. 33.
For the respondent,Walter H. Bacon, Jr.

For the appellant,Rex A. Donnelly.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.For reversal— None.Page 206